May 09, 2009
Every silver lining has a sow's ear, or something

So here's my latest dilemma:

Fancy Private University -- FPU for short -- has just created and posted a brand new, very high level position that is potentially* my dream job. However, my immediate and longtime supervisor at FPU is not my biggest fan and isn't likely to strongly (if at all) support my candidacy. This wouldn't be such a big deal if my supervisor weren't viewed as a major rock star within the institution and if her boss, who pretty much knows only what my director tells her about me, weren't (A) very highly placed and influential in the organization and (2) directly reporting to the president, to whom this new position also reports.

Naturally, I intend to apply for the position. I am required, by FPU policy, to inform my supervisor of my application only at such time that an interview is scheduled, but there is nothing to prevent the person or team reviewing applications from mentioning my potential candidacy to my supervisor at any time, whether in passing or specifically to ask about my qualifications. So it seems like it would behoove me to tell my boss up front when I submit my cover letter and resume. Right? But then I'm more afraid that I won't get an interview at all. Although on further thought, I suppose that even if I get the interview, the odds of my ultimately getting the job aren't so great once they ask my boss what she thinks of me anyway. Hell, she could even be on the selection committee.

I am f**ked.

* I say "potentially" because it's not only a new position but an entirely new office and no information has been made available about how it will really work within the bigger FPU bureaucracy, whether there will be legitimate autonomy, and whether there will be support staff available to assist in making the whole thing viable.

Posted by cynical at May 09, 2009 09:47 AM
Comments

Go for it!

I'm sending good thoughts. (I hope you don't get f*cked over.)

Posted by: tomorrow on May 9, 2009 12:48 PM

Like tomorrow said...go for it! Can you schedule an "informational" interview right away and find out more details. It might work as a covert way to express your interest and give you an idea of how to proceed with your supervisor...plus you might be surprised. She might be very supportive of getting you out of her miserable hairs!

It's good practice too. Then you can hire me as your assistant!

Posted by: Karan on May 9, 2009 06:35 PM

Nothing ventured nothing gained.

I put in a claim on the "special assistant for telecommuting operations" job you plan to create; my qualifications include being further away from you than anyone else, thus knowing more about telecommuting than anyone else.

Posted by: Linkmeister on May 11, 2009 04:18 PM

New jobs for everyone!!

Posted by: cynical on May 11, 2009 10:23 PM

Um ... I like my job.

And, I just got tenure. (Oh, wait. This isn't about me ... my bad.)

Posted by: tomorrow on May 12, 2009 11:06 AM

I take it back, Tomorrow. How about, "New jobs for them what wants 'em"?

Posted by: cynical on May 12, 2009 10:44 PM

Your dilemma is probably all too common. But with that said why not automatically include the names of some "impressive" people who WOULD give you a good recommendation? That way, if by chance your Sup. does not "highly" recommend you, the committee may wonder if it is your Sup. and NOT you who has an "issue."

But by all means, if you are interested in the job I would say apply. And if you got it, you'd be twice a winner. You'd get a new job that you hopefully would love and you would no longer have this Sup. who apparently does not appreciate your attibutes.

Posted by: Nancy on May 13, 2009 10:36 PM

This exchange reminds me of a Simpsons Halloween special.....

Kang, as Bob Dole, campaigning: Abortions for all!
Crowd: Boo!
Kang: Very well. Abortions for none!
Crowd: Boo!
Kang: Hmmm. Abortions for some. Miniature American flags for others!
Crowd: Yay!

I realize this is is no way relevant.

Posted by: TJ on May 17, 2009 10:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?